Worldviews

THE SPECTRUM OF TRADITIONAL HUMAN WORLDVIEWS

Click on the categories below to see each paradigm’s conclusions. On smaller screens, scroll to the right to see the whole chart.  Click here for a printable pdf version.

EIGHTH Paradigm  SEVENTH Paradigm
Left Systematists
SIXTH Paradigm
Left Marginalists
FIFTH Paradigm
Left Middle Marginalists
FOURTH Paradigm
Middle Marginalists
THIRD Paradigm
Right Middle Marginalists
SECOND Paradigm
Right Marginalists
FIRST Paradigm
Right Systematists
GALACTIC  UTOPIAN PROGRESSIVE  LIBERAL MODERATE CONSERVATIVE  BI-PARTISAN  AUTHORITATIVE

Higher Manifestation

Cosmology

COSMOGENISIS EMMANATIONISM
“CONSCIOUSLY” “ENFOLDED” INTO ‘MATERIAL’ MANIFESTATION 
BY ETERNALLY-EXISTING INFINITELY-UN-BOUNDED “SEA” OF TOTALLY UN-“DIFFERENTIATED” CONSCIOUSNESS
DEITY – CREATED COSMOS AUTOMATED (“NATURAL”)
“CONDENSATION” FROM PRE-EXISTING “SEA” OF CONSCIOUSNESS
PRE-“BIG BANG” ORIGIN YET TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY ASCERTAINED CIVIL-RELIGION “GOD”
“GOD”-CREATED UNIVERSE
PERPETUAL SELF-CONTAINED,
SELF-EXISTING COSMOS
ENTIRELY UNEXPLAINED
“BIG BANG” ORIGIN

Teleology

We are evolving, incarnation-by-reincarnation, progressively  toward DIS-‘Incarnate’
CONSCIOUSNESS
 POST-CONSCIOUSLY  ENFOLDED-INTO- MATERIAL MANIFESTATION
MOVEMENT TO “THE “ESCHATON”
POST-DEITY-CREATED NATURAL LAW FUNCTIONING BUT HUMAN-“INTENTION” “QUANTUM” CO-CREATED UNFOLDING ENTIRELY “NATURAL LAW” FUNCTIONING POST-ULTIMATE EXPANSION CONDITION (and TELEOLOGY) YET TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY DETERMINED THE PERPETUALLY-OSCILLATING HUMAN WILL-INFLUENCED-UNFOLDING
OSCILLATING COSMOS
THE PERPETUALLY-OSCILLATING  MECHANICALLY PRE-DETERMINED COSMOS (THE ETERNAL RETURN) TIME-LIMITED EXPANDING & CONCURRENTLY TOTALLY DISINTEGRATING COSMOS -UNTO NO-“THING”-NESS
(ENTROPY)

Ontology

We, as a Human Family, Must Now Integrate The Fact that  “Consciousness” “evolves” elsewhere in our Universe VASTLY BEYOND the state of Materially-“Incarnated” Consciousness that OUR VERY MOST-EVOLVED “Human Beings” have EVER attained  (including Jesus; Buddha, Mohammad & THE MACHTI) Every  Inchoate Quantum Field is a “HOLO-GRAPHIC” “Nodal” or “Micro-Cosm” of  The Eternal  “Cosmic Consciousness” “joined” in constant intimate communion with ONE BEING “Consciousness” is the experience directly experienced by an adequately-complex confluence of “Mass” & “Energy” of a  subtle electro-magnetic “Field” that “bonds together” every  Inchoate Quantum Field in The Entire Universe  into ONE, UNIFIED & HARMONIOUS WHOLE “Consciousness” is a “Point of Focused  Intuitive Attention” From the “Perspective” from which an “entity” can intuit data “relative” to the “self”  experienced by that”entity” Certain Things (or “Entifications” of  Mass and Energy”)  Manifest  “Consciousness”  (which  appears, Scientifically, to be Some Type of “Electro-Dynamic” Phenomenon) BUT this requires more Scientific Research to Determine What “Consciousness” is “Consciousness” is an “Integral” “Third Element” of “Material” Reality with “Mass” & “Energy”  “Consciousness” is a Mechanical
Epi – Phenomenon of  The  Physical Inter-Action Between “Mass” & “Energy” “generated” by an  Adequately Complex  Mechanical  “Confluence” of “Mass” & “Energy”
PANPSYCISM

Every “Thing”  in The Universe is More – or  Less “Conscious”, Merely to a  Greater  or Lesser Degree

Epistemology

We Human Beings NOW have access to the NEW Information  Provided by The Extra-Terrestrial Species to “Supplement” our Human Knowledge We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY GIVE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE TO the “data” that we discern through the exercise of TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION (or “Prayer”) to add to the data obtained via our Human Intuition – as a “factor” having EQUAL VALUE to the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” – because we are CONFIDENT NOT ONLY that our Human Intuition IS the function of some merely as yet NON-Scientifically – Confirmed “Biological Faculty” …much like “Seeing” or “Hearing” or “Tasting” or “Smelling”  BUT ALSO that we Human Beings possess YET ANOTHER Human “Faculty” that is able to directly “access” THE INFINITE & ETERNAL “SEA” OF UN -DIFFERENTIATED  CONSCIOUSNESS We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY GIVE CENTRAL IMPORTANCE TO the “data” that we discern through the exercise of our Human Intuition – as a “factor” having EQUAL VALUE to the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” – because we are CONFIDENT that our Human  Intuition IS the function of some merely as yet NON – Scientifically Confirmed  Biological  Faculty …much like “Seeing” or “Hearing” or “Tasting” or “Smelling” We Human Beings CAN RELIABLY “supplement” the data that we come to KNOW via the direct experience of Our Five Physical Senses; via The Traditions Conserved By Our Ancestors & And Via Our Utilization of “The Scientific Method” THROUGH  the partial integration into our “rational” analysis of our HUMAN  INTUITION – which MAY HAVE some as-yet NON-“Scientifically”- Confirmed Validity We Human Beings CAN “KNOW” data – but ONLY data that which has been subjected to – and generated by – “The Scientific Method” We Human Beings can also KNOW data that has been “conveyed” to him BY HIS TRADITIONS  CONSERVED BY THOSE WHO HAVE GONE BEFORE We Human Beings  (In Addition To The Direct “Sense Data” That We  Directly  Experience Via Our FIVE [ONLY] Physical  Senses) CAN ALSO Subtly “Discern” The Eternally On-Going   DUAL-istic Dynamic Taking Place in Our Oscillating Cosmos Each Human Being can TRULY KNOW  only The Direct “Sense  Data” That  He or She Directly Personally Experiences Via His or Her FIVE (ONLY) Physical Senses

Mode of Ethical Reasoning

We must “Take Into Account” in Determining What is “Best” for Us, As a Species, to Do

How This Choice Affects Our Relationship With This Extra-Terrestrial Civilization

Seeking to Comport One’s Own Personal Conduct In Accordance With The Perfect ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE of THE CREATOR OF The Universe – And To Assist, By Way Of One’s Own Personal Example, Our Human Family to Voluntarily Do The Same Collectively Seeking To Comport One’s Personal Conduct In a Manner That Most Perfectly “Harmonizes” With The Natural Order of The Universe – and To Attempt to Persuade, By Reasoned Argument Continuing to utilize “The Scientific Method” as the means of determining “Fact” and continuing to “supplement” that data by giving “ancillary” weight to data obtained thru “Intuition”  BUT Remaining “open” to increasing the “weight” to be given to intuition-generated  data if that data calls for treating “The Least Well Offer” even BETTER Insisting upon subjecting all propositions of fact to The Scientific Method  BUT GENUINELY & OBJECTIVELY Exploring “Revolutionary” Theses,  Including the prospect that we human beings possess “other ways of knowing” than the presently-“scientifically-acknowledged” “senses” Remaining supportive and “avocational” of “Traditional” values, customs & insight BUT Respecting and being willing to “feather in” CONSTRUCTIVE  progressive “amendments” Making all decisions by remaining “open” to the CONSTRUCTIVE Dialectical Dynamic of the TAOIST inter-action between TWO only apparently “conflicting” Energies Making “AuthoritTATIVE but NOT AuthoritARIAN  leadership decisions in the interests of the entire “community” of people – as though they were ALL one’s personal family

Philosophy

PanenTheism Radical Monism Pythagoreanism Aristotlianism Nathan Adler Lao Tsu Heraclitus

Political Philosophy

  Democratic Theocracy Gnosticism Spiritual Communitarianism Pure Democracy Republic Two-Party Democracy Authoritative Autocracy

Mode of Spiritual Expression: World Religion

Mysticism Zen Buddhism Islamic Sufism Monastic Christianity Kabalistic Judaism Taoism Pantheism

Social Order

Utopian Planetary Representative Theological  Council Progressive Global Multi-Continental  Intuition-Guided Council Idealistic Inter-Continental Bio-Regional
Social Democracy
Moderate Continental Bio-Regional Democracy Conservative
Multi-Bio-Regional Nationalism
Bi-partisan
Bio-Regional-ism
 Authoritative Intra-
Bio-Regionalism

Modern Exponent

The Dali Lama, Desmond Tutu,
Dom Helder Camara
   Deepak Chopra Vaclav Havel Jimmy Carter King David of Israel King Leonidas of Thermopylae Auda Abu Tayi of the
Howeitat Bedouin Arabs

Lower Manifestation

Cosmology

William Stroeger Keppler Steven Hawking Copernican Eternal Oscillation Entropy

Teleology

Teilhard de Chardin:
Eschatology
Max Plank John Locke Scientific Logical Perfectionism Kierkegard Frederick Hegel
Dialectical Progression
Charles Darwin:
Random Evolution

Ontology

Spinoza
Heidegger
Speculative Realists
Mme. Helen Blavatsky Plato
“Plato’s Ontology or Philosophy of Being/Reality”
Aristotle’s Ontology
(See: stromatais.blogspot.com/2011/02/ aristotles-ontology.html)
Newton’s “Scholium” in his Naturalis Principia Mathematica (See: “Newton’s Neo-Platonic Ontology of Space” by Edward Slowik at philsci-archive.pitt.edu/4184/) Dialectical Ontology
John Scottus Eriugena
Daniel Dennett
“Dan Dennett on Patterns and Ontology” at www.replicatedtypo.com/dan-dennett-on-patterns-and-ontology/10849.html)

Epistemology

Theology Philo Thomas Aquinas Emanuel Kant David Hume Epicurus

Mode of Ethical Reasoning

Voluntarily comporting one’s conduct – and openly advocating that our collective conduct be comported – pursuant to the effectuation of the teleological objective of The Infinite & Eternal Sea of Entirely Un-Differentiated Consciousness Having Enfolded Into Material Manifestation The Material Universe Voluntarily comporting one’s own conduct – and openly advocating that our collective conduct be conducted – in sympathetic resonance with – the vibrational frequency of the Unitive Phenomenon of The Universe  Seeking “The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number” – While, at the same time, At Least Something For   The Least Well-Off
John Rawles
Seeking “The Greatest Good For The Greatest Number”: Mechanical Non-“Transcendent” Principle Compromise Between Extremes

John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham

The Assertion of One’s WILL To Promote The Interests of One’s NATION over an “Other” Nation The “Vanquishing” of The Ultimate Other” To Promote The Interests of One’s TRIBE (or Race) Immediate Self Interest Seeking of One’s Own Personal Gratification in the form of POWER, RICHES OF MATERIAL GOODS, SEXUAL SATISFACTION & FAME (sometimes in the service of one’s personal FAMILY)

Philosophy

Theism Radical Monism Pythagoras Aristotelianism
Aristotle
Existentialism
Jean Paul Sartre
    Dialectical Materialism
Karl Marx
Hedonism
Thomas Hobbs

Political Philosophy

Utopian Natural Law
(Progressive)
Social Democrats
(Liberal)
Representative Democracy
(Moderate)
Republicans
(Conservative)
Neitzsche, Adam Smith, Karl Marx
(Reactionary)
Machiavelli
(Authoritarian)

Theory of Human Psychology

William James Carl Jung Cognitive
Jean Piaget
Humanistic
Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers
Socio-Cultural/Behavioral
B.F. Skinner
Psycho-analytical FREUDIAN
Erik Erikson
Neuro-scientific
Structuralism

Mode of Spiritual Expression

Gnosticism Occult Theosophy Pythagorism, Platonism Scholastic Catholicism Israeli Judaism Secular State Religion Voodooism

Social Order

Theocratic Honestly-Educated  & Objectively – Selected Meritocracy  Alexandrian Philosopher King &
Meritocratically – Elected
Representative Bicameral
Parliamentarian Democracy
Religious Monarchism State Capitalism
vs. State Communism
Authoritarian Dictatorship

Modern Exponent

Evelyn Underhill Vaclav Havel Z. Brzezinsky Mario Cuomo Samuel Huntington Henry Kissinger Richard Perl
Faculty Soul ESP See Hear Smell Taste Touch
Musical Key B A G F E D C
Verb Am Intuit Communicate Love Think Will Act
Chakra Crown Chakra Brow Chakra Throat Chakra Heart Chakra Solar Plexus Chakra Sacral Chakra Root Chakra
 
Function Being Intuition Communication Love Power Assertion Procreation Survival
Form of Matter Spirit Quantum Subatomic Atomic Gaseous Liquid Solid
Body Divine Monadic Atomic Buddhist Mental Astral Physical
Scope Trans-Cosmic Cosmic Planetary Continent Nation Tribe (Race) Family

2 comments on “Worldviews”

  1. Mark Petry Reply

    your worldview octave is a completely new way to explain why different people act the way they do ! the worldviews and related material have totally changed the way I look at the world ! Donations sent. thanks for this important work, it is a fantastic contribution to our body of cultural knowledge and evolution.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bitnami